A leaderboard sorted by profit tells you who got lucky recently. It says nothing about whether that result survives being copied by someone who is not them, with a different account size, entering seconds later. Ours is sorted by copy score instead.
The default view is every wallet that passed our screen, ordered by how copyable it has been. Tabs narrow that down: by copy mode, by window, and by a few curated cuts such as recent standouts and best individual trades. The tabs are views of the same ranking, not different rankings.
Sharpshooters is a separate page for wallets that combine a high win rate with the rest of the screen. It exists because win rate is the metric people search for first, and showing it in isolation would be misleading, so we show it inside the same scoring context.
Compare is for the moment after you have narrowed down. Put two or more wallets next to each other and read them on the same metrics at the same time, instead of holding one page in your head while you open another. Every trader page has a Compare button for this.
Every row links to the full trader page. Nothing on the leaderboard is a recommendation; it is an ordering, and the ordering is only as good as the question it answers, which is copyability rather than performance.
The pool is refreshed continuously and wallets enter and leave it. A wallet that stops meeting the screen stops appearing, which is intentional: a stale ranking is worse than a short one.